An age of crisis, not a crisis

concepts · updated 2026-10-26 live

An age of crisis, not a crisis

The claim

Several slow, structural crises are under way together, arriving as interludes and storms rather than as one event, within a transition that is decades long and mixed-mode. It is a thesis, and evidence for and against belongs on this page.

The frame has six legs:

Dollar debt, including deleveraging and definancialising.
Resources: when extraction becomes uneconomic.
Fossil energy and climate.
Ecological overshoot beyond climate.
Legitimacy and social trust.
Deglobalisation: anticipated, not yet clearly emergent.

Legs 4 and 5 come from the substrates the departure-in-place network says industrial flow systems degrade (soil, water, climate, social trust), so the frame is no longer only for economic and market questions and overlaps substrate-maintenance by design. The 2025 book outline's overshoot chapters are a point-in-time view, not his current position (dip-book-outline-2025).

Disposition

The frame: live. Changed 2026-10-26 from contested, with James's agreement. Reason: with six legs the frame is a working lens rather than a single testable claim, and its legs stand in very different places; calling the whole page contested hid that. The risk now is the opposite of contestation: with this many legs almost any bad news fits, so the frame needs stated conditions that would count against it:

the legs turn out to be independent rather than coupled;
interludes keep outlasting storms;
the fossil decline continues without a supply shock.

The legs, each with its own disposition:

Dollar debt: supported in part. The crisis is in the safety premium, not (yet) in the reserve share.
Resources: contested. It holds as rising energy and land cost per tonne and as concentration, not as running out; the evidence cuts both ways.
Fossil energy and climate: climate supported; fossil system contested. Emissions are at a record; fossil electricity may have peaked.
Ecological overshoot beyond climate: stub. No evidence collected yet.
Legitimacy and social trust: stub. No evidence collected yet.
Deglobalisation: forecast. Contradicted as a present crisis; watch the leading indicators.

Live: his working frame. Re-check with James before relying on it. Contested only where marked (resources; the fossil-system half of leg 3).

The legs

1. Dollar debt (supported in part)

For: CBO projects net interest above 3.2% of GDP in every year 2026-36, the highest since at least 1940. Debt passes the 1946 record (106%) by 2030 and reaches 120% in 2036 (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61882). Treasuries have lost their safety premium over AAA corporates and hedged G10 bonds, and markets now price US debt as risky (lustig-americas-risky-debt-2026).

Against: the dollar's share of reserves is steady at ~57% (IMF COFER 2025Q4), and headlines (not read) say the dollar still rallied as a haven when the Iran war began.

Reading: the crisis is in the safety premium, not (yet) in how much of the world's reserves are held in dollars. (Session trail-2026-10-11-b, read 2026-10-11.)

Deleveraging and definancialising. His "great simplification" includes deleveraging and definancialising alongside deglobalising and relocalising (pmc-dependency-chains, DiP network); they belong with this leg. scale-as-justification-for-rent adds his view that the scale argument justifies concentrated asset ownership and rent.

2. Resources (contested)

The question, in James's framing: not whether resources run out, but when extraction becomes uneconomic, given expected demand growth, known reserves and the expected rate of cost increase. USGS reserves are an economic category, so their growth does not answer this either way. The framing already exists in the literature: Tilton & Lagos (2007) call it the opportunity-cost paradigm, "the race between the cost-increasing effects of depletion and the cost-reducing effects of new technology", measured by real price, which they say has been flat for 130 years (ore-grade-depletion-debate).

Concentration and chokepoints (session trail-2026-10-11-b, read 2026-10-11). For: refining of energy minerals is more concentrated. The top-3 share rose from 82% to 86% over 2020-24, and the top single refiner averaged a record 70% in 2025. China leads 19 of 20 minerals, and the copper pipeline points to a ~30% shortfall by 2035 (IEA GCMO 2025 https://iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025/executive-summary ; 2026 https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2026/executive-summary). Against: the IEA says supply of nickel, cobalt, graphite and rare earths is catching up with demand, and rare-earth concentration fell slightly 2023-25.

Physical cost per tonne (session trail-2026-10-11-c, read 2026-10-11). For: Chile's copper mines used 53.9% more energy in 2024 than in 2010 for 1.6% more copper; that is 36.2 GJ per tonne, +51.5% (cochilco-mining-energy-2024, via a secondary summary). Across 25 mines, ore grade fell ~25% in 2003-13 while energy rose faster than output (ore-grade-depletion-debate). In Chile diesel is 92% of mining fuel, which ties this leg to leg 3. One country's series is not the world's. Against depletion: world copper reserves in 2024 were 3.5x those of 1970, even after more than twice the 1970 reserves had been mined since (USGS); falling grade is read as technology and demand, not exhaustion (Rötzer & Schmidt 2018).

How the race has been won so far, and where it is being lost (session trail-2026-10-12, read 2026-10-12). For: WORLD6 (Sverdrup) gives one reason that is neither geology nor engineering: ore treatment cost fell from ~$40 to ~$25/t partly by "moving to low-cost countries", and the authors say that lever is ending. Uneconomic extraction also arrives first as the loss of a cheap process route: Chile's leach/SX-EW copper (no smelter needed) is projected to fall from ~40% of output in 2009 to 6% by 2034, because the leachable oxide ores are exhausted (cochilco-hydrometallurgy-2023). Where small producers keep mining as grades fall, it is because a state institution carries processing, credit and price risk for them (Chile's ENAMI since 1927/1960; meller-enami-cepal-2021). Against: Gordon et al. (2007) note that price failed as a scarcity signal for oil, so a flat price is weak evidence either way.

Secondary supply: re-extraction (session trail-2026-10-19, read 2026-10-19, abstracts and search text; addition from trail-2026-10-21, search text). Against scrap as a hidden price brake: the stock of old copper scrap tripled in 40 years but secondary production from it only doubled, and the unrecycled stock barely responds; only the yearly end-of-life flow (~4% of available old scrap) does (gomez-tilton-copper-recycling-2007). For the leg in a new form: towns sit on large "hibernating" copper stocks, cables disconnected and left in the ground (0.04-0.05 t per grid subscriber in two Swedish cities, up to 20% of it out of use; at least 560 t of copper under municipal land in Norrköping), which were uneconomic to recover at 2011 prices except alongside other digging (wallsten-urban-infrastructure-mines). At 2026 prices one such stock is being worked at national scale: BT has recovered 22,347 t from the old telephone network since 2023 and expects up to 200,000 t, sold forward to a recycler, with a record price "driven partly by data centre construction" (bt-openreach-copper-recovery-2026). The re-extraction threshold is crossed first where digging is cheap and the copper is clean: with non-digging extraction during a fibre install the recovered copper nets 60-280 SEK/m, and rural telephone copper was "straightforwardly profitable" to recover even at early-2010s prices (wallsten-urban-infrastructure-mines, telco-copper-retirement-2023-2026). Historically the secondary trade began at the poorest edge of the city, with immigrant pickers and boy junkers stripping copper pipe and sheathing, and its consolidation into an industry erased them from the record (woloson-child-junkers-2019).

Reading: the leg holds as rising energy and land cost per tonne and as concentration and chokepoints, not as running out (copper is the exception on supply). The "when does extraction become uneconomic" race has a mirror image, "when does re-extraction become economic", whose threshold is crossed by price and by digging that happens anyway (the fibre rollout), not by recycling technology. These sources sharpen the question and add mechanisms but do not settle it, hence contested.

3. Fossil energy and climate (climate supported; fossil system contested)

For: fossil CO2 hit a record 38.1 Gt in 2025 (+1.1%), leaving ~4 years of the 1.5°C budget (Global Carbon Budget, https://globalcarbonbudget.org/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-hit-record-high-in-2025/).

Against, on the fossil side: fossil electricity fell 0.2% in 2025, including falls in China and India, and renewables overtook coal; on Ember data fossil electricity peaked in 2025. In April 2026, during the Hormuz crisis, wind and solar generated more electricity than gas worldwide for the first month ever, with no global switch from gas to coal (Ember, https://ember-energy.org/latest-updates/solar-surge-halts-fossil-electricity-growth-worldwide-in-2025 ; https://ember-energy.org/latest-updates/for-the-first-time-wind-and-solar-generated-more-electricity-than-gas-worldwide-in-april-2026/).

Reading: the climate crisis holds; the fossil system may be at a turning point rather than in crisis, which cuts against a "fossil crisis" as distinct from a "climate crisis". (Session trail-2026-10-11-b, read 2026-10-11.)

4. Ecological overshoot beyond climate (stub)

His statements: industrial flow systems degrade soil, water and climate (substrate-maintenance, DiP network); the held tension "have we all given up on climate change, topsoil loss, deforestation, mass extinction?" (departure-in-place); technology replacing living soil processes with fossil nitrogen (https://exitmusic.world/the-technological-mindset). Leg 3 covers carbon only.

Evidence: none collected yet. Leads for a session (not yet read, so no figures here): the planetary-boundaries updates from the Stockholm Resilience Centre; IPBES global assessments on biodiversity; FAO work on soil degradation; against, regions where soil, forest cover or species trends have recovered.

5. Legitimacy and social trust (stub)

His statements: social trust is one of the substrates industrial systems degrade (DiP network); the liberal narrative cannot separate the gains from the harms and is failing, felt in "the bitter experience of the post-2020 order"; mutual aid grows where people can't trust disembodied institutions (liberalism-selective-blindness, professional-class-misrecognition, https://departurein.place/learning-to-need-each-other/).

Evidence: none collected yet. Leads (not yet read): long-run trust-in-government series (Pew), the OECD Trust Survey, the Edelman Trust Barometer; against, where institutional trust has held or recovered.

6. Deglobalisation (forecast)

Status: James expects it but it is not yet clearly emergent, so the research question is "what would show it arriving?", not "is it happening?". The trade data contradict it as a present crisis, not as a forecast.

Against, strongly, as a present crisis: globalisation is at a record level. H1 2026 goods trade grew at its fastest pace in 15 years outside the Covid rebound, driven by AI hardware, and the Hormuz effects stayed concentrated in Gulf economies (dhl-globalization-tracker-2026). It is one source family, and a logistics firm, but UNCTAD's volume figures agree. As stated ("deglobalisation"), the leg does not hold on current data as a present crisis.

For, partly: the composition is changing. Strategic sectors went from 16% to 44% of greenfield FDI over 2020-25, while ordinary manufacturing FDI fell, by 70% in low-income economies (unctad-wir-2026). Reading: not less globalisation but securitised globalisation. (Session trail-2026-10-11-b, read 2026-10-11.)

Leading indicators. Already in the wiki: the strategic-sector share of greenfield FDI (above); the concentration of mineral refining (leg 2). To track: export controls, tariff levels, chokepoint disruptions, and trade growth with AI goods excluded (see the AI capex signal below).

Across the legs

The AI capex boom

On sources already read, AI investment touches every leg:

Deglobalisation: AI-enabling goods drove 42% of goods-trade growth in 2025 and 76% in Q1 2026 (dhl-globalization-tracker-2026). The record trade figures that count against leg 6 rest heavily on one boom; if it unwinds, the underlying trend may look different.
Resources: BT's record copper price is "driven partly by data centre construction" (bt-openreach-copper-recovery-2026).
Fossil energy and debt: data-centre electricity demand and debt-financed capex are plausible links; no source read yet.

This cuts against the DiP network's aside that AI is "marginal to these drivers, or possibly an accelerant": on current data it is a driver of the trade and copper figures. Flagged on departure-in-place for James. Connects to scale-as-justification-for-rent (the scale argument at its largest) and Arrighi's question of who owns infrastructure at a cycle's end (steer, Open).

Hormuz as a stress test

The Hormuz crisis (from 28 February 2026) touches legs 2 and 3 through food: UK fertiliser depends on gas, and UK nitrogen, phosphate and potash dependence is set out on uk-food-security-findings (claims there are under revision by the reference check). Since wind and solar outgenerated gas in April 2026 with no switch to coal (leg 3), the shock tested fertiliser and food more than electricity.

The frame against the literature

The closest academic version is polycrisis (lawrence-polycrisis-2024), which needs hyper-connection as the medium crises travel through. That pulls against leg 6.

History of this page

2026-10-11: four legs (dollar debt, resources, fossil/climate, deglobalisation); disposition contested because the legs pointed different ways, so there was no basis to move the frame as a whole (trail-2026-10-11-b). James then dropped deglobalisation after the trade data ("Leaves 3"); the remaining three still needed testing, so the page stayed contested.
2026-10-11 to 2026-10-21: resources leg reframed and tested over four sessions; disposition unchanged each time.
2026-10-26: deglobalisation restated as upcoming; the frame widened to six legs; the page restructured from its accumulated update passes into one account, with nothing removed; disposition changed from contested to live for the frame, with per-leg dispositions (reason under Disposition).

Provenance: James, in conversation with Claude, October 2026, and his DiP idea network and blog posts (unverified as a whole); evidence as cited per leg. Disposition: live (frame); per leg as listed.

Part of thread: thread-transition

Linked from (28)