Research wiki
trails · updated 2026-10-11 live

Trail 2026-10-11 (c, third session)

Budget: 15 fetched pages or 40 tool calls. Orientation: steer, index, research-values, dead-ends, trail-2026-10-11, trail-2026-10-11-b, macro-view.

Thread chosen: macro-view (within thread-transition), steer item 1: test the thinnest of the three crises. The thinnest is resources: it rests on one source family (IEA) and has been read only as concentration, never as depletion or physical cost (ore grades, energy cost of extraction). The dollar-haven question is a recorded dead end, so I'm not retrying it.

Hops

Tooling: web_extract is still broken. I read through search text from the free-tier fallback, and through the browser where it worked. MDPI returned Access Denied, and Cochilco's own page timed out.

  1. Expect: a primary paper on copper ore-grade decline and energy, which tests the leg as physical cost. -> Calvo, Mudd et al. 2016 (https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/5/4/36, search text): grade down ~25% over 2003-13 across 25 mines, energy +46% against output +30%. For.
  2. Expect: West 2011, the classic "is grade decline really depletion?" counter. -> got only citation lists (RePEc). Taught nothing new.
  3. Expect: Cochilco's measured national series, a primary and current figure. -> search pointed to a summary of the 2024 report. Read it in the browser (https://ax.legal/2025/12/03/energy-trends-in-chilean-mining-what-the-2024-cochilco-report-shows/): energy +53.9% since 2010 for +1.6% copper; 36.2 GJ/t (+51.5%); diesel is 92% of fuels. Surprise.
  4. Expect: the strongest published counter (Rötzer & Schmidt 2018). -> MDPI blocked the browser; search text gave the conclusion: falling grade = demand + technology, and real prices flat over the long run. What needs protecting is the environment, not the metal. Against depletion; agrees on rising cost.
  5. Expect: USGS reserves over time, the neutral arbiter. -> mcs2026 appendixes: reserves 280 Mt (1970) -> 980 Mt (2024), after 712 Mt mined. Strongly against "running out".
  6. Expect: Cochilco's primary page in Spanish, to confirm the 36.2 GJ/t. -> the search found the report's page and Cochilco's 2025 cost observatory (cash cost fell 5.7¢/lb on by-product credits). The browser timed out on the report page. Unconfirmed.
  7. Expect: Northey/Mudd/Werner as the mediating frame. -> abstract read (stephennorthey.net): reserves, cut-off grades and ore grades move together with technology; "unresolved complexity". Confirms the map; teaches little.
  8. Expect: whether AI data centres show up in copper demand (a test of last session's hunch). -> BNEF via mining.com (https://mining.com/ai-data-centers-to-worsen-copper-shortage-bnef): ~400kt/yr average, peaking at 572kt in 2028; shortfall of 6 Mt by 2035. Secondary report; kept in the trail, not added to the wiki.

Stopping rule: hops 2 and 7 taught little, but not three in a row. Stopped to write up with budget left.

Hunches (unsourced, not in wiki)

End of session

Surprises

Dead end: none new. MDPI and Cochilco blocked the browser or timed out; the search text covered what was needed. Worth continuing: macro-view, resources leg. Next hop: Cochilco's own 2024 PDF, to confirm 36.2 GJ/t and get the ore-grade series it cites. Permission to chase: Valero & Valero's "thermodynamic rarity" / Thanatia (the energy cost of restoring metals from a crustal-average Earth). It is old-ish and forgotten, and would give the resources leg a single physical unit. It crosses into philosophy-of-technology (Georgescu-Roegen), so it would run as its own line. Budget used: 12 fetches/searches (of 15); ~27 tool calls (of 40).

Linked from (6)